The Guitar Finish Debate, Settled at Last

The Guitar Finish Debate, Settled at Last

The Guitar Finish Debate, Settled at Last

“Nitro always sounds better.”

That might be the most stubborn myth in <a href="colour-and-tone-a-myth-with-a-kernel.html">guitar tone</a>.

For decades, guitarists have argued about nitrocellulose vs. polyurethane finishes. Nitro is “vintage, thin, letting the wood breathe.” Poly is “modern, thick, plastic, and dead.”

But when you move from forum opinions to actual measurements, the story looks very different.


The Theory

The argument goes like this:

It sounds convincing. But is the chemistry really what matters?


What the Measurements Show

When researchers and builders tested it, here’s what they found:

Fender’s own R&D team published results showing no measurable spectral difference between nitro and poly when applied in thin coats. Independent luthiers have replicated it and even run double-blind player tests.

The result? Players couldn’t tell them apart.


So Why Does Nitro “Sound Better”?

Because nitro is different, but not in the way people expect.


The Real Takeaway

Tone isn’t about nitro vs. poly. It’s about thickness and build quality.

So let’s put it to rest: Nitro doesn’t guarantee magic. Poly doesn’t kill tone.

The finish debate is nostalgia, not physics. 🎸


👉 If you enjoyed this myth-busting dive, share it with a tone-obsessed friend and subscribe to to learn the science of guitar sound.

Learn the Tone. Save the Sound.

Master Guitar Tone Like a Pro

Get exclusive early access to the world's first guitar tone training app